The Difference Of The Same Stroke.
One can hardly separate sycophancy
and hypocrisy from our present religion and politics, at least in Africa. On a
continent where religion and politics can be the byzantine and underhand of
deceit and manipulation, it is not hard to see why politicians and religious
leaders, ordinarily contrast and opposite, befriend one another and are often
regarded and effectively treated as demi-gods in our modern African society. That
undeserved impression has led these leaders to acquire much power and put
themselves aloof from their subjects, who look up to them as their source and
seem too gullible to disentangle themselves from the choking chain of their
admired tyrant masters.
The amount of power a god exercises
over its subject depends on the degree of respect the worshipers accorded to
the gods. The power of the gods ceases immediately when the worshipers or
subjects withdraw their respect. Can that be said about our political or
religious leaders?
As moral authorities, ideally,
religious leaders ought to act as a shining example – and a check on the
political leaders. Yes, normally. But imagine a situation where you share the
same characteristics and aspirations with the opponent you want to correct.
That sameness might lead to attractiveness and give no room for correction.
After all, the adage that says birds of the same feather flock together seems
to fit African society. Hence, when African religious leaders interpret
religious texts in such a shallow way to serve their selfish motives, it
becomes less surprising for them to quickly discover the goodness – and
sameness - in the Devil. What an irony! Why not if the discovery or
interpretation would serve one's aggrandisement? After all, the world is a
stage where everyone plays their part — a dance arena with masquerades
displaying their musical talents to enchant and seduce the spectators.
You would expect our religious
leaders to epitomise simplicity and humility when seen as the earthly redeemers
or God's representatives. After all, Christ never drove on a Mercedes car.
Sorry, Christ's time was that of horses and chariots, so excuse our flamboyant,
extravagant and choosy religious leaders for going for private jets instead of
ordinary common transportation. The political masters are hardly
different.
Unlike
their lucky political mates, who inherit the State treasury and the financial
hive, in which they often deepen their rotten infectious hand at will,
religious leaders might not have that luxury, but their oratory arsenal is
intact. They equally never fail to shrewdly misinterpret the tithe and actively
engage in praise-singerism (You call it what? sycophancy and hypocrisy?)
to feed their glutted greed. Hardly do they hide their rapaciousness nowadays.
Disambiguation? Sure, religious leaders are well-trained in making things
clear; yes, calling a spade a spade includes speaking the truth - and revealing
their true nature. The manifestation from speech to acts. What else defines
humanity and its characteristics? Are we on the same page? The same stroke?
Sure, why not?
The identification with a leader
legitimates believability, and that credibility and validity may lead to
preying on the trusted subjects. When political leaders present themselves as
the solution to the subject's problems or religious leaders as the gateway to
their followers' salvation and a solution to their problems, leading by example
becomes the ultimate test and prerequisite. Disambiguation? But birds of the
same feather flock together, don't they? If a leader (whether political or
religious), the assumed solution to your problem fails to fulfil their promises
or deliver, not once, not twice, it may well require a quick psychiatric
evaluation or an urgent medical check-up on the part of the subject, if they
still gullibly trust the mentor. That continuous trust and support of the
subjects in the face of the apparent shortcomings of their leaders open the
floodgate to the intellectual devaluation of the subjects. In fairness, would
those leaders be blamed solely for the gullibility of the subjects?
The manipulation, deceit, and false
promises will continue unchallenged when the two unlikely siblings cohabit
harmoniously in a symbiotic relationship.
If the purpose of a relationship is
mutual benefit, it goes without saying that every tree that does not bear good
fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Likewise, any leader who fails to
meet their expectations must be re-considered. The same goes for religion and
politics. Any religion or political organisation that does not positively
change life and living conditions must be carefully scrutinised and abandoned.
Until Africans reason and stop
being gullible, they will remain entangled in the yolk of religious and
political greed, hypocrisy, flattery, deceit and lies.
A better way not to become a victim
of that societal manipulation is to recognise that the difference of the same
stroke hardly makes the stroke different.